Divorce

An independent report on sharia law, commissioned by Teresa May when she was home secretary, reported last week on the operation of sharia law in England. The review was set up because of a concern that sharia law was being used as a second legal system in England and potentially sharia councils were discriminating against the women who use the councils to seek a divorce. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/applying-sharia-law-in-england-and-wales-independent-review Sharia law and councils have no legal standing in England and Wales. It is often reported in the media that sharia law is operating in Muslim communities in England and Wales. It is also said that sharia ‘’courts’’ are becoming a parallel legal system in England and Wales. The report highlights the misconceptions that many people and the media have over sharia law and confirms the fact that sharia councils are not ‘’courts’’ and the members of the council are not ‘’judges’’ and don’t make decisions that are legally binding in English law. Why the concern then about the operation of sharia councils? The worry that led to the commissioning of the independent report into sharia councils was that about 90% of the people who seek help from the councils are women wanting a divorce. Women are the main users of sharia councils as married men don’t need to apply to the council for an Islamic divorce as they can issue a Talaq – a unilateral declaration of divorce. Some will question the need for government concern over women securing Islamic divorces through sharia councils but the worry is that women are reaching financial agreements with their husbands over the division of family assets in order to secure their husband's consent to an Islamic divorce or that when sharia council members are unofficially ‘’mediating’’ agreements with a couple they are applying Islamic law rather than English law to how family assets should be divided and adopting a very different role to a qualified family mediator. That puts Muslim women at a financial disadvantage when seeking a divorce, in comparison to their contemporaries using the British Courts. So why would a woman go to a sharia council rather than to a traditional family law Court to get a divorce and a financial settlement? The report states that many women resort to using sharia councils because they underwent Islamic marriage ceremonies and therefore aren’t legally married under English law. In general that type of marriage can put women under a real financial disadvantage in comparison to women who have participated in an Islamic marriage as well as a British recognised civil ceremony. When coming to its recommendations the authors of the report recognised that to stop women being disadvantaged by turning to sharia law and councils the women needed an alternative redress: the family Court system. The report therefore proposes a change in the law to require those going through an Islamic marriage ceremony to have a civil recognised marriage ceremony. That would then mean that married men and women would have to apply to the Court for a divorce and a financial order. The report also highlights the need to educate on the availability of Court remedies even if a couple have used a form of ‘’mediation’’ or arbitration at a sharia council. That is because the ‘’agreement’’ reached at a sharia council may not reflect the financial outcome that a wife would reasonably expect to receive in an English family Court or is unaware of the options open to her after reaching an agreement as part of the package of getting her husband's agreement to an Islamic divorce. No doubt it will take a while for the report’s conclusions to be digested and fully considered by all the interested parties and any agreed actions implemented through changes in the law. In the meantime what should you do if you think that your only option is to apply to a sharia council for a divorce? Take legal advice from a specialist family solicitor. The sharia council may not be the only option available to you and getting legal advice on what a family Court would award you in divorce Court proceedings could make all the difference to whether or not you decide to use a sharia council , and if you do , the outcome of how family money and property is divided. For advice about any aspect of family or children law please call me on +44 (0) 1477 464020 or email me at louise@evolvefamilylaw.co.uk

As a divorce solicitor, I often complain about some of the seemingly archaic rules and procedures that have to be complied with to obtain a divorce in the UK. Not only does a petitioner for a UK divorce have to establish that their marriage has irretrievably broken down as a result of adultery, unreasonable behaviour or after a period of separation, but they also have to fill in a divorce petition and sign a supporting statement during the Court process in order to finalise the end of their marriage and get a Decree Absolute of divorce. The divorce process can involve a lot of form filling and normally takes between 4 to 6 months to complete. Many people in the UK have heard of the Talaq and perhaps think that an instant divorce by a husband repeating the word ‘’Talaq’’ three times would simplify the divorce Court process in the UK. Undoubtedly it would but many Muslim countries are now banning the Talaq on the basis that it is unfair to women as whilst a women can agree to marriage she cannot initiate a Talaq, leaving women vulnerable to being quickly discarded without Court process and without financial protection. . As reported by the BBC, India’s Supreme Court is one of the latest Courts to rule on the Talaq divorce process and to rule it unconstitutional. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-40897519 The Indian Supreme Court reached this opinion after 5 women appealed against the use of the triple Talaq by their respective husband's and the injustice it created for them and their children. The Indian Supreme Court agreed that the Talaq is unfair. In addition, the European Court of Justice has also recently looked at the Talaq and given an opinion on whether a Talaq is a valid divorce. The Court has ruled that European laws do not cover Sharia divorce. That means a Talaq divorce can't be recognised by the European Court of Justice and needs to be accepted by the individual country as a valid means of divorce. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-42424547 What does this all mean for UK wives who are told about a Talaq divorce or alternatively are threatened with one? ATalaq divorce isn’t recognised in the UK unless the Talaq was not only legal and effective in the country in which it was pronounced but also complied with procedural requirements. That means the UK Court will have jurisdiction to decide on whether the couple can get divorced or not, provided that the marriage is a legally recognised marriage in the UK. If so, not only does the wife get the protection of having to petition or respond to a formal divorce petition but she can also ask the Court to help her financially with an interim or short term maintence award ( known as maintenance pending suit ) and / or long term financial orders sorting out ownership of property and payment of maintenance. So if you are presented with a Talaq or threatened with one then legal advice should be sought. The Talaq may well not be valid and , as importantly, there are legal UK Court remedies to help sort out child care arrangements and financial matters. For advice about any aspect of divorce or children law please contact us. [related_posts]

In this blog, children and child abduction solicitor, Louise Halford, looks at what habitual residence means and why it is important in children law proceedings, and in applications for child arrangement orders and disputes over parental child abduction. For expert child abduction and children law advice call our team of specialist divorce lawyers or complete our online enquiry form. Why is your child’s habitual residence important? For international families the legal concept of habitual residence in children law is important. If your child is classed as habitually resident in England, then the court in England and Wales will have the jurisdiction to decide where your child should live, who they should have contact with and whether they can live overseas. A child’s habitual residence can be complicated because a child can be habitually resident in the UK even though the child is not a British citizen and nor are their parents. If your family is in the UK on a work visa or family visa or dependant visa, your child may be habitually resident in England. If you are planning to leave the UK with your child it is best to speak to a children law solicitor to see if your child may be habitually resident in the UK and to understand the steps you need to take to legally take your child out of the UK. If your child is habitually resident, and you don’t follow the correct steps and procedures before leaving the UK with your child, then you could be committing a child abduction offence. The English court could order that your child is returned to England so the English court can decide on where your child should live. What does habitual residence mean? Put simply, habitual residence means where you normally live. A child can be habitually resident in a country even though the child’s parents don’t live in that country. Habitual residence does not have anything to do with your nationality as you don’t need to be a British citizen or have indefinite leave to remain to be habitually resident in the UK. It is a question of fact. When assessing if a child is habitually resident in England, a child abduction solicitor or children court will look at how integrated the child is. For example, does the child go to school in the UK? Is the child enrolled at sports or other leisure groups in the UK? [related_posts] What happens if my child is habitually resident in England? If your child is habitually resident in England then the English court has jurisdiction to decide where your child should live if there is a dispute with the other parent. Under English law you can't take a child to live overseas without the agreement of the other parent and the consent of anyone else who has parental responsibility for the child. If you can't get written permission you can apply to court for a relocation order. If you leave the UK without a relocation order or written consent then you could be accused of parental child abduction and your child could be made the subject of a return order. The law may seem bizarre to some parents, especially when you are intending to return to a home country or a country where you have strong family or other ties. However, children law solicitors recommend that you get legal advice on the meaning of habitual residence and how the legal concept may affect you and your family and the children law order solutions available to you so you can go ahead with your plans to leave the UK with your child. For expert child abduction and children law advice call our team of specialist divorce lawyers or complete our online enquiry form.

Pension claims on divorce are always a tricky issue because pensions are not the same as any other kind of asset. This is because a pension cannot be fully accessed straight away, whereas all other assets usually can. One way of dealing with them is to split the pension in two (called 'pension sharing'). However, this kind of solution has never been very popular since it was introduced over 15 years ago, partly because the person with the pension tends to have an emotional attachment to it, partly because the person without the pension wants cash (or another asset) instead of the pension, and partly because to achieve a fair split you need a report from a financial expert, which normally costs £1500-£3000 in extra fees. So most people resolve the pension issue by 'offsetting' the value of the pension against other assets in the matrimonial 'pot'. For expert help with your Divorce and Pension call our team of specialist divorce lawyers or complete our online enquiry form. Comparing the Values of Pensions However, this leads to another problem: How do you compare the value of a pension against the value of another asset? Until now, the way this was done in most cases was to take the cash equivalent value ('CEV') of the pension and then lop off a bit (non-scientific i know!) to reflect the fact that it could not be fully accessed straight away. This approach has a number of difficulties, partly because a CEV can underplay the true value of the pension (particularly with final salary schemes) and partly because the 'lopping off' figure is not scientific. A change of approach is in the case of WS v WS [2015] EWHC 3941 (Fam) 11 December 2015. In this case, the 'offsetting' involved was actually between two different kinds of pension; a money purchase scheme held by the husband, and a much larger final salary scheme held by the wife. The other wrinkle was that the husband and wife were already retired. However, I think the principle could apply to offsetting between a pension and any other kind of asset. Instead of using the pension CEV, the court looked at the projected future income from the larger pension (always a more reliable indicator of the true value of the pension), worked out what part of that the husband should have, fed that figure into a 'Duxbury' calculation (the calculation usually used by family courts to capitalise spousal maintenance payments) and the resulting capital figure was the value of the cash payment to the husband to offset his claim against the wife's pension. How Do Pensions Claims Work? Applying this guidance to a 'real world' example: Husband and wife are both 50 years old. Matrimonial home with equity of £500k. Husband has pension with a CEV of £500k and projected future income at age 60 of £20k p.a. Wife has no pension. Husband wants to keep his pension and wife wants more equity in the house to 'offset' the pension. Before any offsetting, wife would otherwise be walking away with £250k from the house. Wife's fair share of the projected pension income is £10k p.a. from age 60. Duxbury calculation says that the capital payment which would produce an income of £10k p.a. from age 60 is £160k. Discount applied for accelerated payment of the £160k (under a pension sharing order wife's share of pension would only start to be paid in 10 years). This is still going to be an arbitrary figure. Say 25% = £40k So the offset figure for the pension is £120k and the wife therefore takes £370k from the house, and the husband takes £130k from the house and keeps his pension. It is going to be interesting to see whether pension liberalisation changes the courts' views of pension offsetting any further. We previously had an indication that the courts will treat pensions more like bank accounts from SJ v RA [2014] EWHC 4054 (Fam) but this is an over-simplification, given the tax consequences of unlimited withdrawals from a pension, but the case of WS v WS demonstrates more enlightened thinking. [related_posts]   For expert help with your Divorce and Pension call our team of specialist divorce lawyers or complete our online enquiry form.

Taking the decision to separate may mean you want to ‘hunker down’ and not make any decisions about divorce financial settlements and the family home. Others may want to get the family home on the market and sold so they can make a fresh start, unhampered by the memories associated with the property. In this article, divorce financial settlement solicitor, Robin Charrot, looks at the options of selling the family home before or after your divorce. For expert Divorce and Financial Settlement advice call our team of specialist divorce lawyers or complete our online enquiry form. Selling the family home – getting the timing right The important thing is to not rush into making decisions about the family home as whilst your instant view may be that you want to move because of the marriage breakdown, or you want to stay because the children’s school is nearby, feelings and circumstances can change over time. There is no right or wrong answer about whether to sell the family home before or after your divorce. A lot will depend on your circumstances. For example, if you are in a six bed property with grounds and the children have grown up and left home, the separation may be the push to sell the family home and to do it now rather than wait until after the divorce. Your views on the timing of the sale of the family home may be influenced by whether you think the property boom will end or not. If you are in the camp that thinks the UK is heading into a recession and a housing market crash, you may believe it is better to sell up now, rather than wait. Waiting may not be in your best interests if you will end up downsizing in a property slump. A divorce financial settlement solicitor can help you look at your options to try and work out which one suits you best. [related_posts] Things to consider about the timing of the sale of the family home There are loads of things to weigh up when you are debating about whether to sell the family home before or after your divorce. Here are just a few: If you sell up, will you buy another house straight away or rent? Is renting a more expensive option or is it best in your situation as you will then be chain free when you find something else to buy If you get off the property ladder by selling the family home, do you risk pricing yourself out of buying the house you want if property prices continue to rise? Is the family home mortgaged? Is a preferential mortgage rate due to expire? Can you transport an existing mortgage to your new property? Will you be able to get another mortgage if you have recently started a new business or because of other changes in circumstances? Is it too early to sell up until you know the value of all the family assets, such as pensions or the family business? You may prefer to stay in the family home by offsetting the value of other assets Until you have more information about your partner’s income and your earnings capacity you may not know if you can afford to stay in the family home with your anticipated income and the potential for spousal maintenance payments If the family home is owned in joint names, or your sole name, your ex-partner could refuse to cooperate with the sale of the family home until a financial court order is made. If the house is owned by you, your ex-partner could place an objection at the land registry to prevent a sale or remortgage. Alternatively, they may only agree to sign the sale paperwork if you both agree that all or a percentage of the net proceeds of sale are retained in a solicitors account until you have reached a full divorce financial settlement when the sale proceeds will be divided in accordance with the financial court order Sale or delay Sometimes people are anxious to sell up because they cannot cope with continuing to live with their ex-partner at the family home as the divorce financial settlement process is taking too long. A divorce financial settlement solicitor can: Advise on whether you have the grounds to apply for an injunction order so you can stay at the family home until the court decides if the family home should be sold. This is known as an occupation order or ouster injunction Help you understand the range of financial settlement court orders the court could make in financial settlement proceedings to assist you in reaching an agreement in family mediation or by through solicitor negotiations For expert Divorce and Financial Settlement advice call our team of specialist divorce lawyers or complete our online enquiry form