Family Law Articles & Advice

As specialist North West family law solicitors we were interested to read the report from the Fair Shares Project. The Fair Shares project was funded by the Nuffield Foundation. It aims to provide information and data on divorcing couples so lawyers and legislative reformers understand how the current family law system is operating. Divorce solicitor, Robin Charrot, looks at the key research findings and outlines the options to reach a fair divorce financial settlement. For expert family law advice call our team or complete our online enquiry form. The Fair Shares Project research highlights The Fair Shares Project aimed to discover information about the financial and property arrangements made by divorcing couples. The 5 key statistical takeouts from the report are: One in 10 couples in England and Wales did not take advice with their divorce Only 2 out of 5 divorcees made use of family lawyers for advice and support. (That means 60% of divorcees didn’t have the help of a family law solicitor)   Around a third of divorcees did not know the value of their pension fund. (If they did not know the value of their own pension asset it is unlikely that they discovered the value of their spouse’s pension pot) Only one in 10 divorcees with a pension fund that was not paying a pension at the time of the financial settlement agreed to a pension-sharing order as part of the divorce financial settlement. (In most families the value of the pension pot of the husband or wife can be the asset with the most significant value. It all depends on the amount of equity in the family home and whether a spouse has a final salary pension). Only around a third of those getting divorced with assets to share with each other split their assets equally. (The family court starts from the premise that assets should be shared equally unless there are cogent reasons to depart from equality. For example, it may be appropriate that a husband or wife gets less than half if it is a short marriage or where the husband and wife signed a prenuptial agreement before their marriage) The research information from the Fair Share Project will concern divorce financial settlement solicitors as it appears to show that financial settlements are being made without the benefit of legal advice and that they are not fair and potentially do not meet a spouse’s reasonable needs. It is normally the wife who suffers by not getting expert legal advice or through not obtaining financial disclosure from her husband as statistically the wife is often the financially weaker spouse in comparison to the husband. Often that’s because she is the one working part-time because of childcare responsibilities or the one who took a career break to prioritise the children’s needs. [related_posts] How to reach a fair divorce financial settlement People can be wary of calling a divorce solicitor for a variety of reasons, such as: Worry about the costs Concern that a divorce solicitor will suck you into contested financial court proceedings and you would be better off negotiating your own divorce financial settlement Does it make financial sense to talk to a divorce solicitor? Would you buy a family home without a survey? Would you rewire your home if you do not have any training as an electrician? If the answer to either of those questions is no then you get the picture. It can be equally dangerous, from a financial point of view, to agree a divorce financial settlement without first taking legal advice. At Evolve Family Law we offer some fixed-fee services and we are always upfront about costs. As well as providing a fixed fee no-fault divorce service we also offer a relationship breakdown consultation for a fixed fee to discuss your relationship breakdown and offer guidance. Our ‘relationship breakdown comprehensive initial review’ is priced at £300 inclusive of VAT and it covers one meeting with a qualified lawyer regarding all the legal and practical aspects of your situation and an assessment of the best routes to resolving your situation. The consultation fee excludes follow-up work, such as starting no-fault divorce proceedings or writing to your husband or wife to seek financial disclosure or to explore their financial proposals. We can talk to you about potential additional costs when we meet so you can make an informed decision on the best way forward for you. Occasionally we may need to charge a higher fixed fee for an initial consultation. For example, if you want us to read a lot of complex paperwork before the meeting. If that is the case, we will tell you before the initial consultation. The objective of our initial consultation is to look at your options so you get preliminary information and support to help you on the path of negotiating a fair divorce financial settlement that meets your short-term and long-term needs. If you want us to check out a proposed divorce financial settlement and convert your agreement into a binding financial court order then we can do that for you for an additional fixed fee. For more information on our pricing look at Our Prices | Standard Fixed Fees. For information on amicable divorce using our one-lawyer service have a look at Amicable Divorce - One Lawyer Divorce. If you are attending family mediation sessions and would like information on your legal rights and options or on how to convert your mediated agreement into a binding financial court order our page on Mediation Support Solicitors may be of interest to you. For friendly expert family law advice call our team or complete our online enquiry form.

You would think that people would know if they are married or not. It is however surprisingly common for either a husband or wife to ask the question ‘Are we married?’ Often the query crops up when a couple is separating or contemplating divorce proceedings. For expert family law advice call our team or complete our online enquiry form. Are you married? Most people would think that a quick look at the wedding photo album would be sufficient to answer the question of whether the couple is married or not but that isn’t necessarily right. One of the first questions for a family solicitor to ask is where the couple got married. If the ‘marriage’ took place in the UK the husband and wife may think that their ceremony of marriage means that they are legally wed. However, if the ceremony didn’t take place at a licensed venue or if the couple didn’t subsequently participate in a civil ceremony of marriage they may not be legally married in the UK. The scenario isn’t that uncommon as often the focus is on the religious marriage ceremony, which has the real meaning for the couple and their family and friends. That can leave those, for example, who have enjoyed a Muslim religious ceremony of marriage or those who married in a Wiccan ceremony not legally married. [related_posts] Marriages in unlicensed venues Most people won’t be surprised to hear that the law can step in and decide if a couple is married even if they didn’t comply with the UK legal requirements at the time of their marriage ceremony. A husband or wife can ask the court to declare that they are married if certain criteria are met. Invariably if declaration of marriage proceedings are started then either the husband or the wife is arguing that they aren’t legally married. That means there is a risk that the court will decide that the couple is not married. Why marriage matters If the court decides the couple isn’t married then there is no need for divorce proceedings. Importantly financial claims on separation will be limited as the husband and the wife won't be able to make claims against the other’s income or pension. The type of ‘marriage’ ceremony can therefore affect whether a couple is treated as married in the eyes of the law or legally viewed as cohabitees. In some cases that can mean the difference between getting half the house and the pension and maintenance and getting nothing as a cohabitee. Marriages that take place overseas If the ‘marriage’ took place abroad there is often an assumption that the couple aren’t legally married in the UK. That is often an incorrect assumption as provided that the marriage was recognised as legally valid in the country in which it took place it is normally accepted in the UK as a marriage. That means that if the couple is settled in the UK they can get divorced in the UK and the English court will decide on how their assets are divided, even though they got married at a chapel in Las Vegas, a beach in the Caribbean, or a religious ceremony in their country of origin or choice. These rules can throw up surprising results as the quickie marriage in the Las Vegas chapel may be a legally valid marriage in the UK whereas the well-photographed religious ceremony at an unlicensed venue may not be, even if attended by all of the couple’s family and friends. If you are contemplating marriage then there is no reason why you can’t have the wedding of your choice in either the UK or abroad, but if you are planning a religious ceremony or a wedding at an unusual venue or abroad it is sensible to check the status of the ceremony so both bride and groom know where they stand. For expert family law advice call our team or complete our online enquiry form.

Family law disputes come in all shapes and sizes. It may be a dispute between a divorcing couple trying to reach a financial settlement or grandparents seeking a child arrangement order so they can get to see their grandchild or a parent terrified that their ex-partner intends to leave the UK with their son or daughter. Increasingly, family law disputes involve cohabiting couples. The couple may be heterosexual or LGBTQI+ and they may or may not have children with disagreements bubbling away over what parenting arrangements are in the child’s best interests. As a specialist firm of Northwest family law solicitors, we can advise you on how best to resolve a cohabitation dispute and help you understand your legal rights and options. For expert family law advice call our team or complete our online enquiry form. What is a cohabitation dispute? To a family lawyer, a cohabitation dispute can be many things as it encompasses any falling out between a couple who are not married and who are not in a civil partnership. A cohabitation dispute can be limited to the arrangements for the children or relate to money and property or both. Cohabitation disputes over children law issues can involve: Disputes over the parent the children will live with after the separation Contact arrangements Applications for child arrangement orders to sort out residence and contact Disputes over whether both parents have parental responsibility for their children Disputes over the exercise of parental responsibility, such as choice of school International family issues, such as one parent wanting to move overseas with the children and the other parent objecting Child support payments Top-up child support through a court order (where the parent paying child support is a high earner) School fee orders to pay for private school fees Requests for lump sum orders to meet the needs of dependent children Requests for housing for children whilst the children are still at school or university Non-children cohabitation disputes normally centre on property, such as ownership of property. This could be the family home or a buy-to-let property portfolio or a family business. [related_posts] How do you resolve a cohabitation dispute? The first step in resolving a cohabitation dispute is to check and see if a cohabitation agreement was signed. If an agreement was prepared, it may set out the parties’ rights to property and what should happen if there is a dispute. For example, the agreement may say that one partner will keep the property and the other must leave the property if the relationship ends. A cohabitation agreement can save you a lot of time and money as it records your agreement. If you did not sign a cohabitation agreement then you may still be able to resolve and agree on the financial and practical issues relating to your separation. You may be able to do this by: Solicitor negotiations Roundtable meetings Collaborative law Arbitration The Evolve Family Law One Lawyer service How does a court resolve a cohabitation dispute? If you cannot reach an agreement you may need to start or respond to court proceedings. Unlike a divorce, a court decides a money or property related cohabitation dispute based on property and trust law. Therefore, the court has less discretion to do what is ‘right’. In divorce financial settlement proceedings the court looks at fairness rather than strict legal and property rights. Talk to a family solicitor about your cohabitation rights If you are in a cohabiting relationship, it’s important to speak to a family law solicitor so you understand your rights. Many people assume that the rights of a cohabitee are the same as a husband or wife or civil partner. They are not. A cohabitee has the same rights as a married person if they are subject to domestic violence in a family relationship and a cohabitee has similar rights if there is a children law dispute over the arrangements for the children. Property law rights between cohabiting and married couples are very different. A cohabitee can't claim spousal maintenance or a share of their partner’s pension. Nor can they claim a share in property or other assets unless they have a legal or beneficial interest in it or they can make a claim based on the needs of a dependent child for housing. This is a complicated area of law. For example, your partner may legally own the family home but the other partner may have a financial claim through property or trust law. That claim gives them a beneficial interest in the property. The court could order the sale or transfer of the property to the non-legal owner. That’s why it’s important to understand your legal rights as a cohabitee. Unfortunately, many people assume they are entitled to nothing as they weren’t married or their name wasn’t on the title deeds to the family home. Whatever your circumstances it is best to speak to a family law solicitor if you are leaving a cohabiting relationship and you want to understand your rights and options. For expert family law advice call our team for an appointment or complete our online enquiry form.

When you are contemplating a divorce, you want to know what a wife is entitled to in a divorce settlement. In this blog, our divorce solicitors answer your questions on divorce financial settlements and entitlements. For expert family law advice call our team or complete our online enquiry form. A wife’s entitlement to a divorce settlement After no-fault divorce proceedings are started a husband or wife can start financial proceedings in the family court for a financial court order to provide them with a divorce settlement. The divorce court has the power to make a range of financial court orders, including: Spousal maintenance Payment of a lump sum Sale of the family home and division of the equity in it Transfer of the family home from joint names or one spouse’s sole name to the other spouse Sale or transfer of investments Sale or transfer of shares in a family business Pension sharing In limited circumstances, the court can also make child support orders, such as top-up child support or payment of school fees. In every application for a financial court order, the court has the power to make all or some of these orders in favour of either a husband or wife. The court decision isn’t based on gender but on a range of statutory factors. These are referred to as the section 25 criteria by divorce solicitors. What will a wife get as a divorce settlement? What a wife will get as a divorce settlement depends on the section 25 factors. In the UK there is no statutory formula to say that the wife gets the family home or the husband keeps his pension or business. Instead, divorce solicitors have to look at all the circumstances and the section 25 criteria. If a couple has dependent children, then the divorce settlement will be shaped by the children’s needs. That’s because section 25 factors say that the court’s first concern should be the welfare of those dependent children and how their needs will be met. If the children will continue to live with the wife, then the children and wife will need a house to live in and enough income either via the wife’s salary or child support or spousal maintenance (or a combination of the three) to pay the outgoings on their family home and other reasonable expenditure. The section 25 criteria The section 25 criteria are: The income, earning capacity, property, and other financial resources that each of the parties to the marriage has, or is likely to have in the foreseeable future. This includes in the case of earning capacity, any increase in that capacity which it would, in the opinion of the court, be reasonable to expect a party to the marriage to take steps to acquire The financial needs, obligations, and responsibilities that each of the parties to the marriage has or is likely to have in the foreseeable future The standard of living enjoyed by the family before the breakdown of the marriage The age of each party to the marriage and the duration of the marriage Any physical or mental disability of either the husband or wife The contributions made by the husband or wife or likely to be made in the foreseeable future to the welfare of the family, including any contribution by looking after the home or caring for the family The conduct of the husband or wife if that conduct is such that it would in the opinion of the court be inequitable to disregard it The value to each of the parties to the marriage of any benefit (for example, a pension) which, by reason of the end of the marriage, that party will lose the chance of acquiring [related_posts] Applying the section 25 criteria to work out the divorce settlement A divorce solicitor is experienced in advising on how the section 25 criteria may apply to your circumstances and explaining about the range of likely orders. That expert advice can then help you reach an agreed divorce settlement either through solicitor negotiations or in family mediation. The divorce solicitor can then help you convert your agreement into a binding financial court order. Without knowing about your financial and personal circumstances a divorce solicitor can't advise you on the likely range of orders as the background information is crucial to the outcome of the divorce settlement. The information will involve financial disclosure as, for example, you will need to know the value of the family business or if there is a trust fund or an additional pension. If a spouse is not willing to give financial disclosure voluntarily it may be necessary to apply to the court for a financial court order as the family court can make disclosure orders as part of the financial application process. The divorce settlement process Our divorce solicitors understand that it is frustrating when a divorce solicitor will not give you what you think should be a straight answer to your question about what a wife will get as their divorce entitlement. That’s because the answer varies on the information you give us about your family circumstances. For example, a wife who has been married 20 years may be entitled to half of all the assets (sometimes over 50%) but a wife married for 12 months, and who signed a prenuptial agreement before her marriage, may end up with a very modest divorce settlement. The first step in sorting out a divorce settlement is speaking to a specialist divorce solicitor to understand the information they need and how it applies to your situation. For expert family law advice call our team for an appointment or complete our online enquiry form.

There is still a bit of wariness about raising the topic of a prenup with a fiancée or signing a prenuptial agreement. In this blog, our Manchester family solicitors look at whether a prenup is a good idea.​ For expert family law advice call our team or complete our online enquiry form. Is a prenup agreement a good option? Manchester prenup solicitors are often asked what the point of a prenuptial agreement is if it isn’t legally binding in the English divorce court. However, although a prenup agreement isn’t binding on the English family court, Manchester prenup agreement solicitors say that provided the agreement is drawn up properly it could be given substantial weight. In real terms, if you are a high net worth individual, a prenup could save you millions. If you aren’t a high net worth individual, a prenup agreement is still a good idea because: The prenuptial agreement could ring fence or safeguard pre-marriage acquired assets, such as a family inheritance, a trust fund, a family business or farm, or a pension that you contributed to many years before your planned marriage The prenup could protect children from an earlier marriage or relationship by making sure that if you get divorced your second wife or husband doesn’t walk away with assets that you brought to the marriage or that you need to provide for your children from an earlier relationship If you draw up a prenuptial agreement before the marriage and the terms are fair to both of you the agreement should reduce animosity and legal costs if you decide to separate at a later date   When will a court follow what is in a prenuptial agreement? If you are contemplating signing a prenuptial agreement then it is essential to know when a court will, or is likely, to follow what is in the prenuptial agreement when ordering a financial settlement as part of divorce proceedings.   There are three potential scenarios if you sign a prenup and either you or your spouse later start divorce proceedings: The divorce court ignores what is in the prenuptial agreement – either because the court doesn’t think that the agreement was drawn up with safeguards in place or doesn’t meet one spouse’s needs The divorce court places weight on the prenuptial agreement and although the agreement isn’t followed to the letter the divorce court makes a financial settlement award that is less generous than it would have made had the prenuptial agreement not been signed The divorce court follows the agreement recorded in the prenup and makes a financial settlement and financial court order in accordance with the provisions in the prenup   You are more likely to get the divorce court to follow options 2 or 3 if the court is satisfied that the prenup was freely entered into by each party to the agreement with a full appreciation of its implications unless in the circumstances prevailing at the time of the separation or divorce it wouldn’t be fair to hold the parties to the terms of their prenup agreement. [related_posts] It is often assumed that there is no free will involved in signing a prenuptial agreement as either the intended husband or wife has all the power and the other person feels that they have little alternative but to sign the prenuptial agreement if they want to get married. However, prenup solicitors say that every prenuptial agreement should be freely entered into to avoid the divorce court ruling that one person didn’t understand the agreement and therefore shouldn’t be bound by its terms. To give the prenuptial agreement the best chance of being upheld in any subsequent divorce and financial proceedings, the following requirements should be met: The terms of the prenup must be fair and meet the needs of the parties and any children who are dependent on them. If the agreement isn’t fair, it isn’t likely that the agreement will be fully upheld or even partially upheld. A good prenup solicitor can advise on the fairness principle the divorce court uses to guide you on what provisions to put in the agreement The prenup was entered into voluntarily with no undue influence or duress and of your own free will and signed and executed as a deed There is financial disclosure of each other’s financial circumstances. Financial disclosure is essential even if you are wary about detailing the full extent of your net wealth or your partner is embarrassed about their debts or income. Unless you know what the other has you can’t make informed choices about what should go in the prenup and what would be fair provision if you were to separate The prenup should be signed in advance of the wedding. The recommendation by the Law Commission report is that prenuptial agreements should be entered into at least 28 days before the marriage or civil partnership Independent legal advice on the prenup is taken. That is to ensure that you both understand the legal consequences of signing the prenup and what you might be gaining or losing by entering into the prenuptial agreement   Should I sign a prenup? You should only sign a prenup if you are willing to be bound by the terms of the agreement. You should not enter a prenuptial agreement thinking that you can argue, in any subsequent divorce proceedings, that the terms of the agreement are unfair to you. That argument may not succeed if the agreement was drawn up properly with the safeguards in place.   Likewise, if you have substantial pre-marriage acquired wealth or you want to ring-fence specified assets or you don’t want financial arguments at the time of any divorce proceedings a prenup can be a sensible option for both you and your intended husband or wife. We are Manchester Prenup Solicitors Manchester and Cheshire-based Evolve Family Law solicitors specialise in preparing relationship agreements and advising on prenuptial agreements. For advice about a prenuptial agreement or relationship agreement or other aspect of family law call us or complete our online enquiry form.

Changing a Will After a Loved One has Passed Away You may assume that if a relative made a Will their wishes cannot be changed after their death. Strictly speaking, that isn’t correct because, after the death of a loved one, you may be able to change their Will by entering into a deed of variation. In this blog, private client solicitor, Chris Strogen looks at when you can vary a Will and the advantages of doing so. For expert advice on making a Will or for advice on a deed of variation call our team of specialist Will lawyers or complete our online enquiry form. Changing a Will after death A Will can be changed after the death of the person who made the Will by entering into a deed of variation or a deed of family arrangement. A private client solicitor can advise you on whether you can do this and if it is a good option for you. For example, it may be inheritance tax efficient. Who can vary a Will after death? Whether you need the agreement of the executors and the other beneficiaries in the Will to the proposed variation of the Will depends on what you want to change. In some situations, you don’t need the agreement of anyone else and only you will need to sign the deed of variation. A private client solicitor can explain the process when they know what you want to change in the Will and why. [related_posts] Can you change the intestacy provision if the deceased did not make a Will? If the deceased died intestate (without a Will) you can change the intestacy provisions by signing a deed of variation. Who needs to sign the deed depends on the nature of the variation. A deed of variation can be particularly helpful if the deceased was in an unmarried relationship. Under intestacy rules his or her partner will not inherit. Instead, the deceased’s parents receive a share of the estate or more distant relatives. In some families, the family may want to change this so the deceased’s unmarried partner receives all or a share of the estate. When can you sign a deed of variation? The rules say that the deed must be signed within two years of the date of death. If you are contemplating making changes to the Will of a family member or friend it is best to speak to a private client solicitor about the proposed changes as soon as you can do so. The benefits of a deed of variation There are many reasons why a deed of variation might be a good idea, including: The Will has left out a family member by mistake. For example, by naming 2 of 3 children in the Will as the third child was born after the Will was signed. The testator should have either changed their Will on the birth of the third child or preferably (to avoid the issue in the first place) left the estate to any children alive at the date of the testator’s death and if more than one in equal shares The Will is a DIY Will and is not inheritance tax efficient. For example, if the husband had left the estate to his wife, then the spouse exemption would apply, and no inheritance tax would be payable on the death of the first spouse. With a deed of variation giving the estate to the wife, she can then give money to the children. Provided she survives for at least 7 years the gift is IHT free There is a Will dispute and the Will is being challenged or a claimant is saying that intestacy rules do not provide them with reasonable financial provision. If it is accepted that the claimant is likely to receive a share of the estate if their claim goes to court it may be sensible to vary the Will. For example, if a couple were in an unmarried relationship for 20 years but the deceased never got around to changing the Will that he made 30 years ago In an ideal world, people would ensure that their Will is reviewed and up-to-date, and tax efficient before they pass. However, family, work, and other commitments can all get in the way of estate planning. That’s why a deed of variation may be the solution to your situation. For expert advice on making a Will or for advice on a deed of variation call our team of specialist Will lawyers or complete our online enquiry form.

Parental alienation is a concept that has gained familiarity through divorce solicitors and child experts writing about the effect of parental alienation on the children of separated parents and on the parent who has been alienated. A recent family court case has suggested the use of the words ‘alienating behaviour‘ rather than labelling one parent as guilty of parental alienation. In this blog, our children law expert Louise Halford looks at the case and looks at how to approach child arrangement order applications involving allegations of alienating behaviour. As a specialist firm of Northwest family law solicitors, our lawyers can advise you on sorting out residence and contact arrangements after a separation or divorce and represent you in a child arrangement order application. For expert family law advice call our team or complete our online enquiry form. What is alienating behaviour? Alienating behaviour or parental alienation is where one parent turns a child against the other parent without good reason. You may think that there is never a good reason to cause a child to reject a parent but some level of anxiety about a parent-child relationship may be justified where there are, for example, very real fears of domestic violence or a concern that a child will get sucked into the other parent’s lifestyle choices, such as the parent’s drug or alcohol addiction. In other families, a parent may not have created the child’s feelings of aversion towards the other parent. The child’s feelings may be down to the child’s misconception that one parent was entirely to blame for the marriage breakdown and for the sale of a much-loved family home resulting in the child needing to change schools. In classic cases of parental alienation, there is no objective justification for the alienating behaviour. One parent, through no fault of their own, is squeezed out of their child’s life. Some parents decide to fight back and apply for a child arrangement order so they can continue a relationship with their child. That’s what happened in the case of Re C ("parental alienation" instruction of expert) [2023] EWHC 345 (Fam). The judge,  Sir Andrew McFarlane, said "The identification of ‘alienating behaviour’ should be the court’s focus, rather than any quest to determine whether the label parental alienation can be applied." That approach makes perfect sense as the behaviour needs to be the focus of the court investigation rather than the label. [related_posts] The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (the independent body tasked with providing reports to the court in children law proceedings for child arrangement orders, specific issue orders and prohibited steps orders) have issued guidance on the sort of behaviour a child might display if they have been alienated against one parent by the other. Whilst the guidance is helpful, it’s best to not be too focused on blaming the other parent for your child’s response to requests for contact but to examine any other reasons for your child’s reluctance to see you. For example, older children can be heavily influenced by their friends or by their social commitments and they may hate the thought of spending time with either of their ‘uncool’ parents. Alternatively, a child may be anxious about a new school or about school exams but instead, refocus their anxiety on parental contact rather than address the real reasons for how they are feeling. The impact of alienating behaviour Alienating behaviour can have a devastating impact on a child’s relationship with either their mother or father. Once a child has been alienated and turned against a parent it can be extremely hard to change a child’s mindset that one parent is bad and that the other one is good and can do no wrong. A child’s simplistic view of their parents can lead to long-term emotional and psychological damage to the child. Initially, the child may seem happier that they have cut one parent out of their life, thus reducing the other parent’s antipathy to the weekly contact handover. However, in the longer term, the child may experience feelings of guilt or even reject the parent who encouraged them to stop or limit contact with their other parent. As family lawyers, we understand that many parents don’t foresee the consequences of being openly hostile or critical of the other parent. To some parents saying what they think about their ex-partner in the presence of their child is a way of letting off steam after a difficult separation and a way of verbalising their own feelings of hurt and rejection. It can be an immense comfort to one parent when a child takes their side and is supportive. However,  the parent’s feelings of anger can be projected onto the child who in turn then rejects their other parent, thinking that their views are all their own idea but, in reality, they stem from one parent’s alienating behaviour. Any child arrangement order application involving allegations of alienating behaviour needs to be addressed with a measure of sensitivity and caution. Whilst a parent denied contact with their child wants action, and most importantly wants contact with their son or daughter, it’s best to acknowledge how essential it is to move forward at the child’s pace to repair any damage created through one parent’s alienating behaviour. Our children law solicitors can advise you on sorting out residence and contact arrangements after a difficult separation or divorce and represent you in a child arrangement order application. For expert family law advice call our team or complete our online enquiry form.

When is a marriage a marriage? How do Sharia Law and Divorce work together? These are the questions that you may need to ask if you are considering separating from your husband or wife. Under English law, if a marriage is recognised as a legal marriage, a husband or wife can make financial claims against the other spouse’s assets. Whilst they might be able to make limited property claims as a cohabitee the financial claims that a spouse can make are wide sweeping. For expert family law advice call our team or complete our online enquiry form. The Nikah, Sharia Law and Divorce  Until a court decision a few years ago, if a Nikah ceremony was carried out in the UK the traditional Sharia law Nikah marriage wasn’t recognised in England and Wales as a legally valid marriage unless the couple also underwent a civil ceremony in a registry office. The second civil ceremony was classed as the legal marriage for official purposes. For most couples who celebrated a Nikah the thought that they were not considered legally married despite their traditional marriage ceremony, family celebration, and their recognition as a couple by family and friends, was repugnant. The law isn’t straightforward. If a couple celebrates a Nikah in a country that recognises Sharia law (and therefore the Nikah is a legally valid marriage in the country where the Nikah took place) the Nikah is recognised as a legally valid marriage in England and Wales. With the court ruling, a Nikah that takes place in England may be sufficient for a husband and wife to be classed as married even though they have not participated in a civil ceremony. Why is it important for a marriage to be legally valid in Sharia law and UK divorce law? If you are not legally married under English law then on separation you do not need to start divorce proceedings because under English law your relationship isn’t recognised as a marriage. Under the law, you are treated as if you were a cohabiting couple. That means that you can’t: Apply for spousal maintenance Apply for a share of your partner’s pension Apply for a share of your partner’s house unless you are a joint legal owner or have what is known as a beneficial interest in the property Apply for a share in your partner’s other assets such as shares in a family business if the shares are all held in his or her name As there is such a vast difference in how married and cohabiting couples are treated by the law on separation it is vital that couples know where they stand and whether their marriage is legally recognised or not. Divorce Court ruling on Sharia law divorce and marriage In a high court case, a Mrs Akhtar sought a divorce from her husband, Mr Khan. He opposed the divorce on the basis that they weren’t legally married having participated in a Nikah ceremony in a London restaurant conducted by an Imam with about 150 guests as witnesses to the celebration. The judge ruled that the marriage was void. This decision allowed Mrs Akhtar to bring the financial claims of a spouse, claims that she wouldn’t have been able to pursue if the court had ruled that the Nikah was a non-marriage. Does the legality of marriage ceremonies just affect those participating in Nikah weddings? Many people have been caught out, believing that they are legally married only to find out many years later that their ceremony isn’t a legally recognised marriage, for example, being married at a venue that doesn’t hold a licence to perform weddings and not subsequently participating in a civil ceremony. This can also affect couples who are married at a traditional Jewish ceremony or those participating in a Wicca marriage. [related_posts] Prenuptial agreements, marriage and divorce If a couple are wary of getting married in a legally valid ceremony of marriage because of the potential financial claims that arise from a legally valid marriage then the option of getting married with a prenuptial agreement in place might be the way forward. Prenuptial agreements are designed to stop or limit financial claims on divorce and can be a very sensible step if one or both parties to the marriage want to protect assets such as pre-owned property or shares in the family business. For expert family law advice call our team or complete our online enquiry form. Contact us for help with divorce and Sharia law.